When Gregg Berhalter took over as U.S. men’s national team head coach five and a half years ago, the program was still fighting to emerge from the darkest moment in its history.
The 2017 loss to Trinidad and Tobago in Couva was more than a wake-up call. It forced leadership at U.S. Soccer to examine every blemish in the mirror. It highlighted the failures of previous cycles to develop young talent. A year after the U.S. failed to qualify for the World Cup, Berhalter was put in place to move the national team forward.
Six years later, after an unsuccessful group stage at Copa America on home soil, the U.S. program must once again face its failures.
This time, part of that evaluation is whether Berhalter is the right person to lead the program into the 2026 World Cup.
If it’s up to Berhalter, the answer is simply, “Yes.” The coach only had one word to share when asked after the loss to Uruguay if he believed he was still the right person for the job. He also acknowledged that the decision would not be up to him. U.S. Soccer leadership will evaluate Berhalter over the coming days.
“Our tournament performance fell short of our expectations. We must do better,” U.S. Soccer sporting director Matt Crocker wrote in a statement provided by the federation 90 minutes after the game ended on Monday night. “We will be conducting a comprehensive review of our performance in Copa America and how best to improve the team and results as we look towards the 2026 World Cup.”
The U.S. lost to Panama and Uruguay during the Copa America group stage. (Photo by Hector Vivas/Getty Images)
Berhalter’s task when he was hired was not a simple one, nor was it one that involved linear progress. His first U.S. teams were a mix of the old and the new, trying to find a blend between experience and pure, stark youth. His first tournament call-ups in the summer of 2019 included Weston McKennie, Tyler Adams and Christian Pulisic, all of whom had yet to play in a Gold Cup, as well as Jozy Altidore and Michael Bradley, both had more than 100 caps. Berhalter next called up a competitive roster for the 2021 Nations League. The team’s progress under his direction was evident.
The roster was built mostly around youth, with players like Sergino Dest (seven caps), Antonee Robinson (10), Adams (12), McKennie (21), Yunus Musah (4), Brenden Aaronson (4), Pulisic (15), Gio Reyna (4), Josh Sargent (13) and Tim Weah (10).
The U.S. went on to win that tournament, picking up its first signature win over Mexico in the process. It was the first of three consecutive Nations League titles, and Berhalter continued adding new, young faces into the program. He navigated World Cup qualifying with one of the youngest teams in international soccer. And while getting back to the World Cup was an imperfect path — the U.S. finished third in CONCACAF qualifying — qualifying for Qatar allowed the program to close the door on 2018. Berhalter’s young team impressed in the World Cup, performing well in the group phase before bowing out to the Netherlands in the knockouts.
Berhalter helped the U.S. return to the World Cup after the team failed to qualify in 2018. (Photo by Tim Nwachukwu/Getty Images)
The idea behind the entire process was to build toward 2026. Berhalter did a good job in the first cycle with this team, but the last year has felt far more halting. U.S. Soccer leaders must now determine whether the coach who engineered the transition from 2018 to 2022 is the right person to continue building toward 2026.
Crocker has said “yes” to that question once already when he and U.S. Soccer’s leadership team, including U.S. Soccer president Cindy Parlow Cone and CEO and secretary general JT Batson, brought Berhalter back last summer. But the USMNT’s failure to get out of its Copa América group has caused yet another referendum on the program.
Taken in isolation, it would be harsh to put all of the blame for the Copa America failure on Berhalter and the coaching staff. Tim Weah’s red card undoubtedly impacted the Panama result, which altered the path to the knockouts. But the results as a whole over the past year suggest stagnation more than progress. Berhalter’s teams still lack a signature win over a top opponent. This past year has seen losses to Germany and Colombia, the latter by an embarrassing 5-1 scoreline. A draw against Brazil was a positive, but it was followed by the Copa America crash out.
The failure to get out of the group was a massive missed opportunity on multiple levels, from the growth of the team to the potential impact on growing the sport in a summer of soccer that can capture new fans and build toward 2026.
Berhalter is a process-oriented coach, precisely attuned to the details of his program. His grinding work ethic is well-known to anyone who has been around the team over the last five years. For Berhalter, what happened in the Copa America was a setback.
“We know we’re capable of more, and in this tournament, we didn’t show it,” Berhalter said. “It’s really as simple as that.” But, much as he has done throughout his tenure with the U.S., Berhalter also framed it as a moment off of which to take lessons and build.
“When you’re in tournament football, there’s very little that separates success from failure,” Berhalter said. “It’s one action, it’s one decision from the referee and you could be in trouble. For us, it’s having this understanding that every time we step on the field, it has an impact. And I think we’re getting there, but we’re not always there. And that’s something that we can improve.”
Players credit Berhlater for creating the group’s close bond. (Photo by Michael Reaves/Getty Images)
After Monday’s game, players in the mixed zone backed Berhalter with some of the same ideas they discussed during the last hiring process. The culture of the team, which they have largely credited to Berhalter, remained a strength in the group. There was a trust in one another, they said.
“I believe we all have a comfort with Gregg and we all understand him and we’ve had him for a long time,” McKennie said in the mixed zone. “He’s progressed the team very far from where we started four or five years ago. I think the connection that we have with him is what’s important, in having a coach that players that would run through a brick wall for, players that listen to him. And so I think whatever happens, happens, but I think if he’s the coach, we’re all happy.”
Only now, U.S. Soccer must weigh whether that comfort is a strength or, potentially, a weakness.
Is the comfort within the group under Berhalter preventing them from pushing on? Are the red cards — specifically Weah’s and defender Dest’s in a Nations League game in Trinidad — signs of too much leeway? Is a group filled with young players too accustomed to discussion around their team as a “golden generation” growing complacent?
The results at the Copa, and over the past year, should at least challenge the way this team is discussed.
Yes, this U.S. team is filled with players who are playing across Europe, including a handful at some of the biggest clubs in the world. And yes, it was still the second-youngest team across the Copa America and Euros. But their roles in those clubs vary, few are asked to carry their teams, and compared to the world’s best teams, arguably outside of Christian Pulisic, the U.S. still lacks bonafide stars, the difference-makers that can turn games on their head at the highest levels. That has manifested itself with a team that has struggled to create enough goals both in Qatar and this summer in the Copa America.
This U.S. team has talent, but in the grand scheme of global soccer, it remains an upstart trying to challenge the very best. The team cannot afford to believe it has arrived. It’s an idea that veteran center-back Tim Ream seemed to hint at in the mixed zone after the game.
“This is a fantastic group, as everyone knows and one that is very close, but sometimes the intensity falls through the cracks,” Ream told Univision. “We have to continue to put our heads down and continue to work, continue to be humble enough to know there are things we can continue to improve every single day, every single training session, every single game.
“If guys have that mindset, then they can continue to be on an upward trajectory. When we start to think that we are a finished product, then guys are going to stagnate and just stay at the level they are at.”
Some of that should fall on the players, of course. That was most certainly a theme from the team after the game. “I don’t think this tournament really had anything to do with the staff or the tactics or the way we play,” Gio Reyna said. “I think it was more individual mistakes.”
But some of it also falls on Berhalter and the staff.
If the leaders at U.S. Soccer feel this team must be challenged to get to the next level, there are legitimate questions as to whether the culture in the program right now is set up to do that. Or whether Berhalter is the right person to do it.
“I don’t think so. I don’t think we’ve progressed enough since the last World Cup,” USMNT legend Clint Dempsey said on Fox on Monday night, when asked if Berhalter is still the right voice to lead the program. “We’re not on the right track. … For me, it hasn’t been good enough.”
As for the next steps, there are many factors beyond just on-field performance U.S. Soccer will consider. The federation likely is aware of the discourse around Berhalter and the national team, in which a growing sector of fans has trained its focus on the coach as the problem. “Berhalter Out” has been a rallying cry on social media, ubiquitous in any discussion or debate around the team.
The biggest question, though, is who they would look to if they were to replace Berhalter.
There aren’t obvious candidates for the position. One finalist from the last hiring cycle, Jesse Marsch, recently took the Canada job. Notably, Canada advanced to the knockout stage of the Copa America, albeit with just one goal in three games in the group stage. Some of the big-name candidates that fans hope to see cost many multiples of the salary U.S. Soccer currently pays Berhalter, and that doesn’t even begin to account for whether those names would even want to take on the U.S. team.
The decision U.S. Soccer makes in the coming days, and if they choose to move on from Berhalter, the weeks that follow will have a massive impact on what happens in two years when the World Cup comes to these shores. The disappointment of a similar result in that tournament would dwarf this summer’s failure.
Considering the stakes and the expectations, the job feels bigger than even the monumental task of climbing out of the failure in Couva nearly seven years ago.
(Top photo: Julio Aguilar/Getty Images)
Read the full article here
